Written on February 23, 2008 by eklipz
Is Realistic Game Play Better or Worse?
Filed Under Community Discussion
Is realistic game play better or worse? This has been discussed for a long time, but lately it’s on fire with the introduction of Counter Strike: Source being endorsed by the CGS, and the majority of top Counter Strike teams making the switch. Players quickly noticed you couldn’t do a lot of things in Source that you could in 1.6. The reason for this is Valve wanted to make Source more, realistic.
In Counter Strike 1.6 you can shoot through brick walls, metal walls, concrete walls, and stone walls giving it a unique feel, but most certainly taking away from the realism.
Now that players are switching to source, it seems the realism can be quite frustrating. Not because they dislike the idea of realistic video games but rather by moving towards realistic game play, they were forced to make significant changes. And like the saying goes, don’t fix something that isn’t broken.
Share you opinion - do you think Valves decision to introduce realistic game play was a good move, or do you prefer the old style?
Subscribe
Keep up-to-date with the lastest articles by Subscribing to our blog via RSS
Honestly the CS series and slot of other series like CoD are the farthest thing from realism. CSS is not even remotely realistic, If you really want to have this debate you need to include a Rainbow6 game title or Ghost recon. Other war games that only have the realistic look, like CSS and CoD4 add a lot of elements that might be good for a realistic shooter but in the end they are pointless and retarded.
Hi all!
http://www.canadianmedsusa.com Viagra is a medication used to treat erectile … Sildenafil … Viagra pills are blue and diamond-shaped with the words “Pfizer” …
cialis levitra viagra
Bye
audi so”
nnvnvnvufyyyfhfnCCvnvnvnvjffFDDDflvlvllvCCVvvmvmvmCCC